Updated Rubric for Self-evaluation (v.2.1)

Updated Rubric for Self-evaluation (v.2.1)

J. Bennedsen, F. Georgsson, J. Kontio (2016).  Updated Rubric for Self-evaluation (v.2.1). 14.

For several years the CDIO initiative have been asking institutions and programmes to do a self-evaluation in order to support the continued improvement of the CDIO implementation at the institution/programme.

The process of creating the CDIO self-evaluation rubric was done in 2007 - 2010. Two of the three authors took part in the final evaluation of the rubric used for the self-evaluation.

Now five years have passed and we have had real experience with using the rubric for several times and several programmes at our three institutions.

In the last two years, we have undertaken the task of updating the rubric. This work has involved questionnaires send out to all CDIO members as well as workshops where the participants should comment on different suggested wordings of the rubric. It has been an iterative process with the goal 1) to make the rubric easier to understand but keep the size of the rubric, 2) to ensure that all criteria were in alignment with the general levels, and 3) to remember the goal of the rubs: institutions can self-evaluate (it is not an assessment tool).The work is partly is documented in (Georgsson, Kontio & Bennedsen 2015; Bennedsen, Georgsson & Kontio 2014)

The article will describe the process and evaluate the suggested update of the rubric based on inputs from a workshop held at the CDIO 2016 world meeting in Chengdu and describe a new version of the rubric.

References Updating the CDIO self-evaluation rubrics (2015) Georgsson, Fredrik; Kontio, Juha, Bennedsen, Jens;. Proceedkings of the 11th Internaional CDIO Conference, Chengdu, China

Evaluating the CDIO Self-Evaluation. (2014) Bennedsen, Jens; Georgsson, Fredrik; Kontio, Juha. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Barcelona, Spain

Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016

Authors (New): 
Jens Bennedsen
Fredrik Georgsson
Juha Kontio
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Aarhus University, Denmark
Umeå University, Sweden
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Keywords: 
Self-assessment rubric
quality assessment
continuous improvement
CDIO rubric
CDIO standards
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2016-01-01 00:00:00
Reference: 
ABET. (2016, February). ABET. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/: 
Bennedsen, J., Clark, R., Rouvrais, S., & Schrey-Niemenmaa, K. (2015). Using Accreditation Criteria for Collaborative Quality Enhancement. Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). Florence, Italy. Retrieved Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12-16, 2016. from http://www.weef2015.eu/Proceedings_WEEF2015/proceedings/papers/Contribution10 92.pdf: 
Bennedsen, J., Georgsson, F., & Kontio, J. (2014). Evaluating the CDIO self evaluation. Proceedings of the CDIO World Conference. Barcelona.: 
Boele, E. B., Burgler, H., & Kuiper, H. (2008, Heft 1). Using EFQM in higher education: Ten years of experience with programme auditing at Hanzehogeschool Groningen. Beiträge zur hochschuleforschung, pp. 94-110.: 
CDIO. (2010, December 16). The CDIO Standards v 2.0 (with customised rubrics). Retrieved January 19, 2016, from CDIO: http://www.cdio.org/knowledgelibrary/documents/cdio-standards-v-20-customized-rubrics: 
CTI. (2016, February). Commission des Titres d'Ingénieur - La CTI est un organisme indépendant chargé d’habiliter, de développer et de promouvoir la formation et le métier d’ingénieur en France et à l’étranger. Retrieved from CTI (Commission des Titres d’Ingénieur): http://www.cti-commission.fr/spip.php?page=sommaire-en: 
EFQM. (n.d.). The EFQM Excellence Model | EFQM. Retrieved from http://www.efqm.org/the-efqm-excellence-model: 
ENAEE. (2016). EUR-ASE System. Retrieved from http://www.enaee.eu/eur-ace-system/: 
Georgsson, F., Kontio, J., & Bennedssen, J. (2015). Updating the CDIO self-evaluation rubrics. Proceeding of the CDIO World Conference 2015. Chengdu: CDIO.: 
Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, M. B. (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. Software IEEE, 18-27.: 
Rouvrais, S., & Lassudrie, C. (2014). An Assessment Framework for Engineering Education Systems. In A. Mitasiunas, T. Rout, R. V. O'Connor, & A. Dorling, Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (pp. 250-255). Springer International Publishing.: 
The Danish Accreditation Institution. (2016, January). The Danish Accreditation Institution. Retrieved January 25, 2016, from http://en.akkr.dk/: 
Go to top
randomness