VISUALIZING 17 YEARS OF CDIO INFLUENCE VIA BIBLIOMETRIC DATA ANALYSIS

VISUALIZING 17 YEARS OF CDIO INFLUENCE VIA BIBLIOMETRIC DATA ANALYSIS

A. Meikleham, R. Hugo, A. Kamp, J. Malmqvist (2018).  VISUALIZING 17 YEARS OF CDIO INFLUENCE VIA BIBLIOMETRIC DATA ANALYSIS. 20.

Bibliometric data analysis has gained popularity in recent years as an efficient means of visualizing multi-dimensional indicators of influence in communities of practice (Youtie & Shapira, 2008). Such an approach has been used to map emerging fields of research such as synthetic biology and nanotechnology (Shapira, Kwon, & Youtie, 2017; Youtie & Shapira, 2008). Using this approach, one can track citation and social network data over time to develop a deeper understanding of the influence of the CDIO initiative on engineering education publications since its inception (i.e., the past 17 years). In this paper, bibliometric data analysis will be used to examine how publications on the CDIO Initiative have evolved. Visualizations are presented using an open-source visualization tool, VOSViewer, and used to understand geographic distribution and co-authorship. A word frequency and co-occurrence analysis has been used to analyze title and abstract data over the same time period. Geographic author network analysis reveals continued growth in regional collaborations over the past seventeen years. Co-authorship by author name reveals a core community of researchers, which has diverged over time into dispersed collaboration groups. Word co-occurrence analysis of title and abstract data from Scopus reveals that design-implement and project-based learning activities have been the central topic of CDIO-related engineering education literature over this time period. An analysis of the terms “faculty competence” and “learning assessment” indicates that these topics are comparatively under-served in the literature, representing fertile research topics for practitioners. The benefit of this research is to provide insight to past development areas and opportunities for growth in the CDIO Initiative. 

Authors (New): 
Alexandra Meikleham
Ronald J Hugo
Aldert Kamp
Johan Malmqvist
Pages: 
20
Affiliations: 
University of Calgary, Canada
Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
Bibliometric analysis
VOSViewer
CDIO
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY. : 
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Beddoes, K. ., Jesiek, B. ., & Borrego, M. (2010). Identifying Opportunities for Collaborations in International Engineering Education Research on Problem and Project-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(2), 9–19. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan, June 28 – July 2, 2018. : 
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1142
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). The CDIO Approach. In Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (2nd ed., pp. 11– 46). Cham: Springer International Publishing. : 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561- 9
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: Complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539–555. : 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.895703
Graham, R. (2018). The global state of the art Engineering Education. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Retrieved from https://jwel.mit.edu/sites/mitjwel/files/assets/files/neet_global_state_of_eng_edu_180330.pdf: 
Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance Instruction Does Not Work : An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching, 41(2), 75–86: 
Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015). A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally Effects on Educational Quality. In Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference (p. 17). Chengdu, China.: 
Shapira, P., Kwon, S., & Youtie, J. (2017). Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1439–1469. : 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2452-5
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50–54. : 
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054847
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2013). A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 833– 849. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.002
Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Mapping the nanotechnology enterprise: A multi-indicator analysis of emerging nanodistricts in the US South. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(2), 209–223. : 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9076-5
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Addison-Wesley Press. : 
https://doi.org/10.2307/2226729
Go to top
randomness