WHO AM I LEARNING TO BECOME? INTEGRATING PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT IN CURRICULUM DESIGN

Home » WHO AM I LEARNING TO B ...

WHO AM I LEARNING TO BECOME? INTEGRATING PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT IN CURRICULUM DESIGN

N. Bohm, M. Hoekstra, L. van den Burg, M. Reincke (2023).  WHO AM I LEARNING TO BECOME? INTEGRATING PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT IN CURRICULUM DESIGN. 770-779.
2023 19th International CDIO Conference, NTNU, Norway
PDF icon CDIO 2023 Proceedings (75).pdf

In this case study, we answer the question: what are design characteristics for a personal development line integrated in undergraduate engineering curricula? We investigated the development of such a line in a Bachelor of Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences in The Netherlands. We documented and analysed the preparation of and discussions during three design sessions, where teachers and students collaboratively created the personal development line.

This personal development line has two main aims: to guide students in developing their personal and professional identities and promote self-directed learning in the curriculum. Reflective skills are playing a key role in this. Four levels on which students reflect in relation to personal development in the curriculum were identified: self, education, practice, and society. Each Personal Development Week in the design proposal touches upon one of these levels and makes use of three generic elements: inspiration, contemplation, and perspective.   

Three tensions in the curriculum arose during the design sessions. First, the question if it is necessary to give students direction by assignments or to trust they will reflect by themselves. Second, if that direction should be shaped by specific writing assignments or if students should be left to work with a free form. Finally, if the reflection should be connected to what students learn inside the university or rather to societal challenges that they perceive outside of their studies.

The personal development line in this research is one answer to the questions arising from these three tensions, yet it is not the only answer. Both the identified tensions and the designed reflection model can be a starting point for other curriculum designers to position personal development in their curriculum. Personal development can then become a key ingredient in the education of a diverse group of reflexive engineers at universities anywhere in the world.

Authors (New): 
N.L. Bohm
M.J. Hoekstra
L.P.J. van den Burg
M.M.O. Reincke
Pages: 
770-779
Affiliations: 
Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Keywords: 
Curriculum Development
Personal development
Self-directed Learning
reflection
reflexivity
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Bain, J. D., Mills, C., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2010). Developing Reflection on Practice Through Journal Writing: Impacts of variations in the focus and level of feedback. Teachers and Teaching, 8(2), 171-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600220127368 : 
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457319 : 
Cheah, S.-M. (2022). Continual Improvement in CDIO: Enhanding faculty competency in reflective practice Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, Rekyjavik University, Rekyjavik Iceland. : 
Cunningham, P., Matusovich, H. M., Hunter, D. A. N., & McCord, R. E. (2015). Teaching Metacognition: Helping Engineering Students Take Ownership of Their Own Learning Frontiers in Education Conference, El Paso, TX, USA. : 
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. D.C. Heath & Co Publishers. : 
Ebomoyi, J. I. (2020). Metacognition and Peer Learning Strategies as Predictors in Problem-Solving Performance in Microbiology. J Microbiol Biol Educ, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1715 : 
Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(2002), 73-85. : 
Kirk, S. (2017). Waves of Reflection: seeing knowledges in academic writing. EAP in a rapidly changing landscape: issues, challenges and solutions, : 
Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Architectural Press. : 
Malmqvist, J., Wedel, M. K., Lundqvist, U., Edström, K., Rosen, A., Astrup, T. F., Vigild, M., Hussmann, P. M., Grom, A., Lyng, R., Gunnarsson, S., Huay, H. L.-W. K., & Kamp, A. (2019). Towards CDIO Standards 3.0 Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus Denmark. : 
McKenna, A. F., Froyd, J., & Litzinger, T. (2014). The Complexities of Transforming Engineering Higher Education: Preparing for Next Steps. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20039 : 
Moon, J. A. (1999). Learning Journals: A Handbook for Reflective Practice and Professional Development. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429448836 : 
Moon, J. A. (2001). Reflection in Higher Education Learning PDP Working Paper 4, University of Exeter. : 
Nesi, H., Gardner, S., Chapelle, C. A., & Hunston, S. (2021). Genres across the Disciplines. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199 : 
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2014). Educational Design Research. SLO. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5 : 
Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2013). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 244-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.661704 : 
Van Dooren, E., Boshuizen, E., Van Merriënboer, J., Asselbergs, T., & Van Dorst, M. (2013). Making explicit in design education: generic elements in the design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9246-8 : 
Wals, A. E. J. (2010). Between knowing what is right and knowing that is it wrong to tell others what is right: on relativism, uncertainty and democracy in environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504099 : 
on November 27, 2023 - 05:06   frebyst
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top