Working- Vs. Educational Processes In Software Engineering Vs. CDIO

Working- Vs. Educational Processes In Software Engineering Vs. CDIO

D. Einarson (2011).  Working- Vs. Educational Processes In Software Engineering Vs. CDIO. 15.

The relatively short history of IT can unfortunately point out a number of failing projects concerning missing deadlines, functionalities, low quality, etc. Theories and techniques have been developed, to meet inherent problems and challenges. But also software process models, that is ways of working, where several typical activities within software processes have been emphasized. Still, the use of software also seems to bring even further requirements on new techniques. A conclusion is therefore that, besides from some core fundaments, inherent parts of IT are, by necessity, evolving in themselves.

When it comes to educational systems, an appropriate set of theories, techniques, and principles should be taught to prepare for working in software industry. Still, this is not enough. A software engineer actually needs to be able to handle all the steps of a software process. That is, educational systems have to find ways to support teachings, not only in theories, techniques, and principles, but also in ways of working that hopefully should correspond well to the practices of software industry. Furthermore, students should be gained by getting educational support to meet and handle the ever changing future.

This contribution presents project based approaches where the process of developing the project result should have several benefits. First, it should provide a basis for training corepractices of Computer Science, second it should prepare for software processes, i.e., ways of working in software industry, and third, it should aim for students being responsible for self learning. Especially, the third point is significantly important in a discipline of ever changing techniques. Inspiration is taken from well known Software Process Models. Such are models are shown to lie close to the CDIO initiative. Software Process Models are discussed, comparisons with CDIO are provided, as well as a case study on a project based course.


Authors (New): 
Daniel Einarson
Kristianstad University, Sweden
Project based learning
Education concepts
Software Engineering
Cooperative work
Evaluations for groups
Arduino micro processor at: Picture of micro processor from that link, picture of house from home department. : 
Bass L., Clements P., and Kazman R., Software Architecture in Practice, Addison-Wesley, 1998.: 
Bowen J. and Marton F., The University of Learning – Beyond Quality and Competence, Routledge, 1998.: 
Einarson D., “Internet of Things in Education”, STTC, China Zhejiang International Science and Technology Cooperation Conference – part Internet of Things (IOT) at Jiaxing, Hangzhou China, 2010, (No paper, only presentation).: 
Einarson D. and Frisk F., “Projektet ”Projektstyrt Projektbaserad undervisning””, A study on project based learning especially for international students, Kristianstad University, 2007, in Swedish.: 
Egidius H., “Pedagogik för 2000-talet”, Natur och Kultur, 2003, in Swedish.: 
Ghezzi, Jazayeri, Mandrioli. Fundamentals of Software Engineering, Prentice Hall, 2002: 
Naur P. and Randell B. (Eds.), Software Engineering: Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Garmisch, Germany, 7-11 Oct. 1968, Brussels, Scientific Affairs Division, NATO (1969) 231pp.: 
News on project presentations of student’s first semester, in Swedish, Kristianstadbladet: Norra Skåne:*/de-villdesigna-nasta-storsaljande-dataspel: 
Rational Unified Process in Education, UPEDU, 
Sommerville I., Software Engineering, Addison Wesley, 2010: 
System structure, free pictures and photos from the internet: 
Worldwide CDIO Initiative: A Framework for the Education of Engineers, 
XP, on eXtreme Programming, 
Go to top