Communication in Engineering Education: A New Way of Looking at Integrated Learning Activities and Forms of Communication

Communication in Engineering Education: A New Way of Looking at Integrated Learning Activities and Forms of Communication

I. Klasén (2011).  Communication in Engineering Education: A New Way of Looking at Integrated Learning Activities and Forms of Communication. 8.

A new analysis and development model has been designed to make the discussion about ‘integrated communication in engineering education’ more multifaceted. The model includes the two main principles of communication in education – communicate to learn and learning to communicate, and new dimensions of how learning in communication is integrated in subject courses. Active and passive integration are two opposite ways of handling integration of communication skills training in subject courses.

By including this approach in the discussion about integrated learning activates and combining them with the two main principles, a model of communication aspects in education can be drawn out. The objective of the model is to more clearly and more multifacetedly point out different types of situations and learning activities where the students are given the opportunity to, in one way or another, develop their skills and abilities in work life communication.

The model has been the subject of a pilot study at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden. In the study teachers from the bachelor level were interviewed about their thoughts on integration of communication in engineering education. In the analysis the model was a base in identifying in what sense communication was integrated and in what area the integration was weak.

The results of the evaluation of integrated communication in subject courses will also be discussed in the light of the teachers’ willingness to make changes in their courses. The conclusion from this study is that the teachers need to rethink in what way they are integrating communication in subject courses. On course level the model of integrated communication can be used to inspire to a broader use of different types of teaching and learning activities do develop communication skills without making a major change in the way the course is carried out. 

Authors (New): 
Ida Klasén
Pages: 
8
Affiliations: 
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords: 
Integrated communication
passive integration
active integration
Engineering education
learning activities
informal communication
formal communication
Year: 
2011
Reference: 
Hobson, E. and Schafemrey, K., “Writing and Critical Thinking: Writiong-to-learn in lage classes”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,Vol. 58 1994, pp. 423-427: 
Myers, N. “An oral-intensive abstract algebra course”, Primus, Vol. X 2000.: 
Hedin, A. and Svensson, L. ”Nycklar till kunskap”, Studentlitteratur,2006.: 
Klasén, I., “Weak representationn of engineering in learning objectives and assessment - sturctural problems”, 6th International CDIO Conference, Montreal 2010.: 
Dahlberg, O. “Nya ingenjörer om utbildning och arbete”, Sveriges ingenjörer, 2009: 
Waldermarsson, B. and Nilsson, A-K., “Kommunikation – samspel mellan människor”, Studentlitteratur, 1990: 
http://www.cdio.org/framework-benefits/cdio-syllabus. [Online] CDIO, 03 30, 2011. : 
Swedish Higher Education Ordinance : 
Carlsson, C J., Edström, K., Malmström, H. “Engineering and communication integrated learning - collaboration strategies for skill and subject experts”, 6th International CDIO Conference, Montreal 2010: 
Carter, M., Ferzil, M. and Wiebe, E., “Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines”, Journal of Business and technical communication, Vol. 3 2007, pp. 278-302.: 
Hoffman, M., Dansdill, T., Herscovici, D., “Briding writing to learn and writing in the discipline in computer science education”, SIGCSE´06 2006.: 
Klasén, I., ”Integrering av kommunikation i ingenjörsutbildningar”, Royal Institute of Technology, 2010.: 
Go to top
randomness